Call Now 800-261-2946

Why The Borrower Defense to Repayment Application 
Grew from 21 to 39 Pages (And What It Means for You)

Defense to Repayment Application

Imagine a simple form you fill out to tell the government your school tricked you, and you want your student loans forgiven. That form used to be about 21 pages, but now the official Borrower Defense to Repayment (BDR) application has grown to about 39 pages.

You might wonder: Why so many more pages?
And more importantly — how does that affect whether your claim gets approved?

Short answer:
The U.S. Department of Education added more questions to make sure they collect enough specific information so they can fairly decide if your school committed misconduct and how much your harm was. More detailed questions = longer form.


📌 What Is the Borrower Defense to Repayment Form?

Before we talk about the length, let’s be very clear about what this is:

➡️ It’s the official form you use to ask the U.S. Department of Education to forgive your federal student loans because your school misled you, lied about jobs, costs, or outcomes, or otherwise did something wrong.

📈 Why the Form Got Longer — The Big Picture

Comparison of old vs new Borrower Defense to Repayment application showing expansion from brief narratives to detailed evidence sections in the 2025 39-page federal student loan forgiveness form

Here are the main reasons the BDR form expanded:

🧾 More Questions About What Happened

The Department added questions that ask:

  • Exactly what your school told you (dates, statements).
  • What documents or proof you have.
  • How the school’s actions hurt you personally (financial harm, career impact).

Government reviewers need details — not just feelings — to decide if the laws were broken.

📍 New Legal Standards and Rules

Borrower defense rules have changed over time through regulations and court cases. The Department updated the application to reflect those changes so they can properly evaluate each claim. 

These include:

  • Clarifying what counts as misconduct,
  • Requiring documentation from borrowers,
  • Addressing newer legal language for state law claims.

🔍 New Changes based on loan period

The new application form doesn’t just ask what happened — it now asks when it happened, because the rules change based on your loan period

Loan Period Qualifying MisconductKey Changes from Old Form
Pre-July 1, 2017Misleading statements/acts important to enrollment decision, causing harm, and suable under state law (consumer protection statutes primarily). No omissions, aggressive recruitment, or breach mentioned separately.Adds state law requirement (not in old form). Old form doesn't differentiate periods.
July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2020Misleading statements/acts or omissions/concealments important to enrollment, causing harm. Limited to employment outcomes, educational programs, financial charges. Judgments (only non-default, favorable, contested; no settlements). Breach of contract if obligations were key to decision and caused harm.Similar to old but excludes aggressive recruitment (present in old form as a category). Specifies no settlements for judgments (old allows any favorable judgment). Omissions explicitly included.
July 1, 2020 onwardOnly misleading statements/acts with school's knowledge of falsity/deception, important to enrollment, causing financial harm. Limited to three areas (employment, programs, charges). No omissions, aggressive recruitment, judgments, or breach.Stricter: Requires "knowledge" and "financial harm" (old form uses general "harm"). Removes categories like aggressive recruitment (in old form: pages 2, 13-14), omissions, judgments, and breach. Adds financial harm section with examples (e.g., unemployment not due to recession, reduced earnings).

🆕 New Category Added: “Representations to Third Parties”

The 2025 Borrower Defense application introduces a brand-new category of misconduct:
Misleading statements made by your school to third party organizations.

This includes false or deceptive claims your school may have made to:

Why this matters:
These external representations impact not just your experience, but public perception, funding, and eligibility rules — and the government wants to know if your school misled outsiders to benefit unfairly.

BDR application new section: misrepresentations to third parties like accreditors or federal agencies

🧾 New Section 5a: Financial Harm (2020 & Later Borrowers)

If your loan was first disbursed on or after July 1, 2020, you must now complete an entirely new section about financial harm — Section 5a.

This section matters more than ever because it asks:

  • Did you suffer financial harm?
  • How much?
  • How do you know?
  • What jobs were you told you’d be qualified for — and what happened?

What the Department wants:

  • Specific details — not just feelings
  • Supporting documents (e.g., job rejection emails, PDFs, screenshots)
  • Any examples of how you were financially worse off due to school misrepresentation
New Section explaining borrower defense financial harm standards after July 1, 2020

📎 More Documentation Requirements

To avoid applications being sent back as “incomplete,” the new form asks for:

  • Supporting documents
  • Transcripts
  • Emails or brochures from the school

This saves you time later — and reduces denials due to missing evidence.

A comparison table showing differences in evidence requirements between the old and new Borrower Defense forms

📌 Why This Matters to You

Your Claim Is More Likely to Be Understood

Longer forms aren’t meant to frustrate you — they help the reviewer see your story better.

⚠️ You Must Provide More Detail

This means you might need more time to gather your files — but that also means fewer denials because of missing information.

📉 Incomplete Claims Are Returned

If you don’t fill out the details now, your form could be returned or delayed — costing time and relief. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/34/685.206

Infographic listing four tips for completing the longer Borrower Defense form: organize school records, write clear answers, upload photo or PDF evidence, and mark 'N/A' when something doesn’t apply

🧑‍⚖️ Legal Impact of the Change

The extra pages help the Department:

  • Avoid decisions based on guesswork,
  • Reduce appeals,
  • Make stronger, legally defensible decisions.

That’s why the legal community — including courts and advocates — keep discussing how the BDR rules work and how the Department applies them. 


📌 Related Resources

➡️OUR DIY Guide to Borrower Defense:
https://defenseclaims.com/borrower-defense-diy-guide

➡️Schools with proven misconduct issues:
https://defenseclaims.com/usable-misconduct

➡️Full list of colleges & universities:
https://defenseclaims.com/all-universities


🔗 Final Notes

The Department didn’t add pages just to make it longer. They added them to:

  • Capture real evidence,
  • Make informed legal decisions,
  • Help prevent avoidable mistakes in your claim.

If you’re serious about student loan forgiveness, take the time to fill out the full application carefully at your own using our DIY guide or contact us for an eligibility check.

An infographic showing the Borrower Defense application process in five steps: Collect Evidence, Fill Details, Submit, Review, and Decision